google

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Gmail and external accounts

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

I’ve been using Gmail for what seems like ages now. I believe I had to find an invite for it when it first came online even. I kept my own mail server for personal mail though. I ran this mail server myself, owned the domain and everything. A few months ago, I got into a consolidation mode/mood and decided to try sending gmail over to my mail server to check mail, giving me all my mail in one location.

A bit of getting used to. Some labelling took care of most issues though it just wasn’t “what I was used to”. After a week or so, I realize Google spam filter was way better than my own spamassassin setup, which was wonderful. I was manually deleting a dozen spam a day and trying to get spamassassin to learn better, but it was just too much. Google got rid of it all.

I then realized that I wasn’t spending any time at all managing my mail server or my mail folder. No deleting spam, no sorting, no emptying trash, nothing. Then it occurred to me, google isn’t doing that either. I loaded up Thunderbird and logged into my server. I had to download thousands of messages that hadn’t been gathered since I started the gmail process. Of course, I had specified in the gmail setup to leave mail on the server as I was just testing things out. What annoyed me a bit was that it didn’t appear to delete anything on the mail server, even the mail that I had deleted within gmail.

But, all is pretty good regardless. My personal mail server actually has a few accounts on it, all funnelled into one inbox, which is then checked by gmail. I’m able to set aliases up so I can respond right in gmail using any of those email addresses. Guess I should just take the next step and set it to delete mail from the server and be done with it.

Ban gmail?

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

Remember back in the day of running forums when hotmail “users” caused so much annoying spam that we basically just banned all hotmail account users? It caused quite a few problems for those that actually used hotmail and couldn’t understand why they weren’t allowed to sign up to sites using it. Well, I’ve been running The CPC for quite a while now and lately I’ve been getting tons of spam from real people using gmail.com addresses. In fact, I have more gmail spam than I do real gmail users.
So should I ban gmail.com on my site? Not on your life. That just seems so wrong on the internet these days. Google can do no harm, not like the big bad Microsoft and hotmail of days gone by. I suppose there are far more savvy gmail users today than there were hotmail users years ago?

Moving “My Documents” with an extra step.

Thursday, April 23rd, 2009

There’s lots of documents on the web that show how to move “My Documents” to another drive, so I won’t bother show how here. One step I found missing however was brought on by my use of Linux. Whenever you move a directory to a bigger drive, I just symlink it so I don’t have to reconfigure anything that doesn’t follow along. Granted, Windows management of “My Documents” is a little more internal than just a directory (or folder in this case), so most everything followed along. Except for Google Desktop. It actually created it’s own folder in “C:\Documents and Settings\” (after I moved everything and deleted the original) and made use of that, so obviously, it uses a full path. Windows doesn’t have a simple/proper symlinking unless you purchased some lame Resource Pack or something. Someone was nice enough to write a tool to fix this, called Junction. You can find it here.

No iTV for me.

Sunday, January 22nd, 2006

So, I’m Canadian. This apparently means something in the online world. I guess some companies can’t afford to pay the taxes or duty on packets crossing the border. I guess they figure our dollar, which by the way is currently sitting at 1.15965 (as of 10:59pm EST, December 21), the highest it’s been in quite some time, isn’t worthy of buying their products. I remember once, a while back, I called up a company that sold some really cool stuff (don’t ask, I don’t remember). I begged them to take my money in exchange for goods and/or services. “Sorry sir, we can’t take your money, your Canadian.” Well fuck you too.

Apple has been touting this TV show download thing from iTunes the past while. I hadn’t paid much attention to it, just another Apple thing. Well, I realized I’ve been missing How I Met Your Mother, with the delightful Alyson Hannigan. I figured now was a good time to see if they offered that on iTunes, since I finally got signed up there. Some digging around revealed nothing. Even downloaded the new version of iTunes, but still nothing. Over to Google I go and it turns out, they don’t offer that service in Canada. The hell?! It’s data jackass, just route that shit over here and charge me for it.

If I ever get filthy rich, I’m going to start up a company that specializes in selling all the goods and services that Canadians can’t get, at rates half what the Americans get it for, and I’m going to wiggle my bottom at the corporate fuckwits (and Canadian agencies putting the hold on things) when they try to complain. “Screw you!” I’ll say. “You had a nice idea. Too bad you didn’t have the testicular fortitude to go through with it!”. Jerks.

They showed me though. They got me to buy an XM Radio. Aren’t I a fool.

Canadian’s aren’t allowed to be safe?

Thursday, December 15th, 2005

Browsing around, read a couple blog entries about it, see another link for it so I decide to check it out. Google’s new “Safe Browsing” Firefox extension sounds like a great idea. Any page you go to that asks you for information, this extension will tell you if the site is doing anything sneaky, or if there are a large number of complains against the site (or so I’ve read). I wasn’t terribly interested in using it full time, but figured it was my IT duty to at least check it out. Clicking on the .xpi link sends me to this page: Not Available. At first I was upset that it would only be available to the US and not Canadians. Upon further pondering, I realized that every page I go to, this extension is going to query Google with the full URL, and let them know what pages I’m browsing. This is a pretty big security/privacy concern that not many people seem concerned about. Of course, this sort of information is what makes Google so good at what they do.

It’ll change the world!

Thursday, October 6th, 2005

Stop me if you’ve heard this one. “Our agreement with Company Y will produce products that will change your fundamental life. We are going to change the world!”. The growing anticipation is almost unbearable. Rumours fly, stocks go up, some jackass gets richer. Finally, the day comes when the world gets to see the product we’re told we can’t live without and it’s…..a toolbar, that most people can’t use for security reasons. Or a two-wheeled scooter that gets banned in 80% of the cities within weeks. Who the hell are these guys kidding? I’m sure Google and Sun are going to do some cool stuff with the Google Toolbar, but including a JRE in it isn’t going to change the world my friend. It’s going to remove the idea of choice that Sun goes on about all the time. As pointless as it would have been, I almost wish they had announced the web-based Office Suite everyone thought they were going to. At least it would have been something tangible.

Has “Going Too Far” Gone Too Far?

Wednesday, September 21st, 2005

I was excited today to find a new issue of The Walrus in my mailbox when I got home for lunch. Like I normally do, I flipped quickly through it, reading the headlines and titles while I munched away on my sandwich. Nothing caught my eye enough to warrant reading right then and there, but one title did make be read it twice. It was “Has X Gone Too Far?” (It wasn’t really X, I just can’t remember what it was at the moment, and the web page hasn’t been updated yet.)

Understand that the content of this article held no particular interest to me, rather, I was interested in the title and topic. I try to read more and more these days, in the hopes I can stay informed and either support or dissolve my social and political beliefs. I’ve even tried to write a little, but realized quickly that I only wrote constructively when I had a topic I was passionate about, and that simply took too much of my time. When I see a title with “Gone Too Far” in it, I’m immediately biased to the negative side of the argument. This influences my opinion without even giving me content, and I don’t like that.

I’m sure it’s a fault of my own in some fashion. Some sort of failure on my part to “walk” into a well written article and be so easily influenced. Meh, so be it. It just seems to me that any hack author with a couple night classes under their belt can scrape the daily headlines for a topic and wrap “Has Gone Too Far” around it. In my lazy style, I will recite my Google findings:

Casual Day Has Gone Too Far
Has TV Gone Too Far?
Curriculum: Inclusion: Has It Gone Too Far?
Sex & music has it gone too far?
Has post-9/11 dragnet gone too far?
Why World War II nostalgia has gone too far..
Has Globalization Gone Too Far?
Has outsourcing gone too far?

1,600,000 English hits. Are all of these topics so far out of control that we need someone to step up and tell us? Are we truly too daft to figure it out for ourselves? My guess is neither of those statements are true. My guess is people have a need to write articles and get them published, which pays the bills and feeds their families. (Yes, yes, I know nothing of who these authors are, but no one pays me to write this, so go to The Hell). Maybe we can spend more time writing articles/essays about things that haven’t gone far enough, like World Peace efforts, Red Cross funding in non-emergency times (though those are few and far between these days), and putting the real crooks and criminals in jail. Has “Going Too Far Gone Too Far”? This non-reporter thinks so.

No more URLs.

Tuesday, September 13th, 2005

Noticed something interesting today that has occured a few times in the past, I just didn’t realize it at the time. I was listening the “Ongoing History of New Music” podcast about record collecting. Alan Cross was giving out some links to people that want “to go deep” into the hobby. Rather than give out links in his podcast, he simply said “Google the address of The Rock Records Collectors Association…”. It’s like we don’t even need URLs anymore, just a decent search query that we can dump into Google to get the site we wanted. Obviously this won’t work for everything, but it’s an interesting trend all the same.

Google AdSense

Thursday, July 28th, 2005

I have Google Ads on another site I run. This site has lots of photographs that people have taken on it, being a photography site and all. This is sort of the main focus of the site. I emailed Google to see if there was something I could to display more relevant ads, since I can’t exactly fill my pages of photographs with text. They’re response? “Add more text.” Well thanks for that, really helps.

Here’s what’s wrong with this scenario. The web is not made up of text only pages. While I appreciate the difficultly in displayed relevant ads on pages based on the content of those pages, I can’t believe the all-mighty Google hasn’t come up with a way to better target sites without using visible text. Obviously, people have abused META tags and hidden text before, but I wonder how many did that in an effort to get better results? Photography has exploded the last few years and I see Google falling behind (with the exception of images.google.com and Picasa). I’m not asking them to read the content of a photograph to display ads based on that. I’m asking for a method to display photography ads on my site when it’s filled with photographs. Not display ads for (real example) “Mayan Palace Nuevo Hotel” just because someone posted a picture of…well…I’m not even sure why that’s showing up. I have no control over it and that annoys me. I could remove the ads, but the photo section makes up 90% of my traffic, and there are quite a number of other sites doing the same.

For the first time since they were running in that Lego enclosure of a computer, I’m disappointed in Google.

Referrer Spamming

Tuesday, August 17th, 2004

Going through the referrers for the web sites I run, I came across the wonderfully inane fad of HTTP Referrer Spamming. Google the details yourself to learn all about it. For now, my only option is to just delete those entries from my access logs on a regular basis (automated script time?) and hope people stop wasting their time. I would just turn it off all together, but its still interesting to know how links to my sites, and how people are finding them.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin